Dear editor,
Saul D. Alinsky is the author of the liberal leftist's political bible titled "Rules for Radicals," with its well-known phrase being, "the end justifies the means."
The translation of this phrase is to use whatever means, legal or not, morally acceptable or not, necessary to achieve a desired goal.
Kathryn Steinle's death by the hands of five-time-deported illegal alien and seven-time convicted felon [Jose Ines] Garcia Zarate aka Francisco Sanchez was adjudicated "not guilty" of murder or manslaughter by a jury of his peers in the liberal leftist sanctuary city of San Francisco.
I am not going to rehash the facts regarding this trial; I will leave that up to you to decide. What I will point out is a trial can be moved to ensure a fair jury for the defendant. What has never happened under our judicial system is to move a trial to ensure a fair jury for the victim.
Considering that the liberal leftist 9th Circuit Court of San Francisco itself is overturned of its decisions 80 percent of the time and a coin flip would offer better odds of getting correct rulings, does what happened with this jury actually surprise you?
Now, Garcia is not an educated individual, and with the fact that liberal leftists love to play with the meaning of words, who do you think gave him his alias? "chez" in Spanish means "at the home of; with; among" and now the rest of his alias name: "San Francisco."
Who do you think aided and abetted this man's stay in the sanctuary city of San Francisco, hid him, gave him his alias, and returned him to the streets only to kill Kate Steinle?
Was Kate only a victim of the means to achieve their goal of open borders?
Her pictures reveal she was so much more than a victim of the liberal left's means to achieve a goal of the Democrat Party!
STEVEN KING
Milton
What's your view? Write a letter to the editor.
This article originally appeared on Santa Rosa Press Gazette: Pier shooting death raises questions