Dear editor,
This is in regards to the Oct. 26 Speak Out about partial birth abortion: Hillary Clinton has (supported) and does support this very late last term of abortion.
If the baby is now outside the mother's womb and in the birth canal, the baby being alive or dead is no longer a factor — it must still be delivered. So the baby's life now no longer affects the mother's chances of surviving child birth.
Any lawmaker that supports this gruesome end-to-life type of abortion is a murderer as long as it exists and they support it. The true argument is at what point of the pregnancy should abortion not be allowed?
If you think doctors should be making this decision alone, then you're also for pill-pushing doctors who do so to enrich themselves; as abortion clinic doctors do so to optimize the selling of baby parts for their next sports car!
Abortion should not be a taxpayer-subsidized form of birth control when a cheaper, more humane type of birth control exists and is paid for under Obamacare, which is also taxpayer subsidized.
As for our history, no president has made a decision regarding the availability of abortions. The decision came from the Supreme Court regarding the Roe vs. Wade civil case.
STEVEN KING
Milton
This article originally appeared on Santa Rosa Press Gazette: Taxes should not subsidize abortion